Our mission

•To limit expansion of tort  liability
•To reduce lawsuit defense  costs
•To speed resolution of lawsuits
•To improve fairness & certainty of
  civil justice system

Our members

The LRC membership is a broad coalition of
 •Government entities
 •Nonprofit organizations

See our member list of over 70 Washington organizations

Stay informed

Sign up for the free LRC E-News, providing supporters of liability reform with quick, concise reports of the latest state and national liability information. To be added to the distribution list, e-mail LRC Executive Director Dana Bieber.

News from the LRC

  • Legislative update
  • Latest installment of the LRC Judicial Scorecard
  • The LRC's Record of Success
  • Wacky warning label contest finalists
  • WSJ: Jury awards demoted boozer truck driver $119,000


Legislative update

Another successful session for the LRC

With the regular legislative session scheduled to adjourn this evening, LRC members and allies can take pride in knowing that hard work has paid off.  There were dozens of liability expanding bills in play this year and each and every one was defeated.  Thanks to a strong lobbying effort by the LRC and its members, the trial lawyers go home empty handed this session. 


 For a list of all liability bills, check out the LRC Bill Tracker


Taxpayers to foot the bill for DOC mistakes

Last December the Governor disclosed that the Department of Corrections (DOC) miscalculated the release date of thousands of inmates over several years.  Officials have said that at least two people have been killed by offenders who should have been in prison.  A $5 million lawsuit has already been filed against the state and it’s likely more will follow.  In response, lawmakers have purposed an additional $15 million dollars of taxpayer’s money to put towards these claims.  Negotiations will continue as lawmakers finalize the supplemental budget. 

LRC shines bright light on the Supreme Court

The LRC has released the seventh installment of its Judicial Scorecard, which is a two-year look back at the significant liability rulings of the Supreme Court and how the nine justices ruled.  The results are interesting, if not alarming.  Only one justice ruled consistent with the LRC’s position in at least 50 percent of the cases.  Two justices received paltry one-digit scores.  The rest are somewhere in the in middle.  The rulings from this powerful branch of government warrant careful and consistent monitoring and the LRC will continue to do so.

The LRC's Record of Success

For the past 25 years the LRC has helped protect Washington’s citizens and businesses from more lawsuit abuse.  No organization more aggressively fights the trial lawyers’ trade association than the LRC.  The LRC has published a Record of Success which shows the long list of bills this organization has managed to defeat in Olympia, to the chagrin of the plaintiffs lawyers. 

Wacky Warning Label Contest

The internationally recognized “Wacky Warning Label Contest,” now in its 16th year, has selected the 2014 winners. While amusing, it’s an embarrassing result of our overly litigious culture. The warning labels demonstrate the ridiculous efforts companies must put forth to avoid lawsuits.


Jury awards boozer truck driver over $119,000

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal and posted on overlawyerd.com blog is one you don’t want to miss: 


In 2009, a driver with Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., admitted to the company that he had an alcohol problem. The company told him that it would no longer allow him to drive heavy trucks for the firm. (It said it offered him a less safety-sensitive, but also significantly lower-paying, dock job.) The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) stepped in and sued on his behalf under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It conceded that Old Dominion could (and indeed had to) take the keys away from a heavy truck driver it found to be currently drinking on the job, but contended it had failed in its obligation to “make an individualized determination as to whether the driver could return to driving and provide a reasonable accommodation of leave to its drivers for them to obtain treatment.” Of course backsliding and remission are common following rehab treatment, which means as a group drivers with known past alcohol problems will have a higher risk profile than drivers without. That is why at an earlier stage of the case I asked, “Are we really required to take chances with 18-wheelers on the highway?”

Now we know the answer: Yes. A jury agreed with the EEOC and awarded the driver $119,000 in back pay.


The posting is from Walter Olson, a commentator, author and critic best known for his work on American law. A senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a think tank in Washington, D.C., he has written a series of widely acclaimed books on our legal system, beginning with The Litigation Explosion, The Excuse Factory, The Rule of Lawyers: How the New Litigation Elite Threatens America’s Rule of Law, and most recently Schools for Misrule: Legal Academia and an Overlawyered America  On the web, he founded and continues to run Overlawyered.com, widely cited as the oldest blog on law as well as one of the most popular. The Washington Post has described him an "intellectual guru of tort reform". 

The LRC was honored to have Mr. Olson as a keynote speaker several years ago at our Annual Meeting.